Haematology and immunology
Neutrophil count, ×10⁹/L
Central lab haematology analyser compared with Point of care haematology analyser. 197 paired results.
Compare it with the other comparisons in the explorer
Comparison line
The new system reads 2.7% higher than the old system on average. The comparison line (Passing-Bablok) has a slope of 1.032 (95% interval 1.005 to 1.061) and an intercept of -0.082.
No decision lines configured for this analyte and unit; comparison only (no switch table, no review band)
Crossing each limit
No crossing count: the program had no decision limits for this comparison.
Grade and warnings
- No decision lines configured for this analyte and unit; comparison only (no switch table, no review band)
Source
Shean RC, Bennett ST (2026). Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Point-of-Care Hematology Analyzer for Complete Blood Count With Differential. Int J Lab Hematol. doi:10.1111/ijlh.70032 (opens in a new tab); PMC12956494 (opens in a new tab). Licence: CC BY 4.0 (opens in a new tab). Re-analysed by NakedSignal. The deposit names the systems.
Show the numbers
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Paired results used | 197 |
| Comparison line slope | 1.031586 |
| Slope, 95% interval | 1.005198 to 1.060518 |
| Comparison line intercept | -0.082487 |
| Mean difference, new minus old, as % of old | 2.722 |
| Decision limits (×10⁹/L) | none |
| Crossed between the two systems | none |
| Expected from repeat testing alone | none |
| Band half-width (%) | none |
| Re-tested, unseen data, median (%) | none |
| Re-tested, unseen data, range (%) | none |
| Excess caught, line and band (%) | none |
| Excess caught, line alone (%) | none |