NakedSignal

Change explorer · Haematology and immunology

Point-of-care red cell count vs a central laboratory haematology analyser

Public dataA public method-comparison deposit, not a laboratory's data. Systems are described generically; the source names them.

Central lab haematology analyser replaced by point of care haematology analyser: 201 paired results from a published study by Shean and Bennett (2026), re-analysed by NakedSignal as if the study were one laboratory. No decision limits are configured for red cell count in ×10¹²/L, so this comparison shows the comparison line and the average difference only.

run 25 September 2026 · config 6eb23df45893 · run file sha256 5586cd892ef1

Haematology and immunology

Red cell count, ×10¹²/L

Central lab haematology analyser replaced by Point of care haematology analyser. 201 paired results.

Compare it with the other comparisons in the explorer

Comparison line

The new system reads 1.5% lower than the old system on average. The comparison line has a slope of 0.959 (95% interval 0.945 to 0.977) and an intercept of 0.123.

No decision lines configured for this analyte and unit; comparison only (no switch table, no re-test band)

Crossing each limit

No crossing count: the program had no decision limits for this comparison.

Grade and warnings

  • No decision lines configured for this analyte and unit; comparison only (no switch table, no re-test band)

Source

Shean RC, Bennett ST (2026). Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Point-of-Care Hematology Analyzer for Complete Blood Count With Differential. Int J Lab Hematol. doi:10.1111/ijlh.70032 (opens in a new tab); PMC12956494 (opens in a new tab). Licence: CC BY 4.0 (opens in a new tab). Changes: Paired results re-analysed by NakedSignal's program; instruments described generically; only derived results are shown. The deposit names the systems.

Show the numbers
All values for red cell count, Central lab haematology analyser to Point of care haematology analyser
FieldValue
Paired results used201
Comparison line slope0.959496
Slope, 95% interval0.945014 to 0.976966
Comparison line intercept0.12313
Mean difference, new minus old, as % of old-1.456
Decision limits (×10¹²/L)none
Crossed after the changenone
Expected from repeat testing alonenone
Band half-width (%)none
Re-tested, unseen data, median (%)none
Re-tested, unseen data, range (%)none
Excess caught, line and band (%)none
Excess caught, line alone (%)none

Changing a system like this one?

Request a first site report